To end off the week (and to help mom in her English class) here is a copy of my Randomly Generated Post-Modernist Essay, which was written by a machine and is completely meaningless (although it reads a lot like an essay I did on Rousseau's influence on the use of terror in the French Revolution).

Reinventing Constructivism: Marxism and predialectic discourse
Ludwig Tilton, Department of Future Studies, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

The characteristic theme of von Ludwig's essay on the subdialectic paradigm of narrative is a mythopoetical paradox. The premise of cultural patriarchialism suggests that class has objective value.

"Society is responsible for hierarchy," says Baudrillard. It could be said that the economy, and eventually the failure, of predialectic discourse prevalent in Spelling's Charmed is also evident in Melrose Place, although in a more postconstructive sense. Derrida uses the term 'the subdialectic paradigm of narrative' to denote the role of the poet as participant.

In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a Marxism that includes sexuality as a whole. Bataille uses the term 'the subdialectic paradigm of narrative' to denote the bridge between sexual identity and class.

It could be said that Porter states that the works of Spelling are reminiscent of Gaiman. Lacan promotes the use of predialectic discourse to deconstruct archaic, sexist perceptions of class.
But the primary theme of the works of Spelling is the role of the writer as artist. Sontag suggests the use of Marxism to analyse culture.